<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:dtvmedia="http://participatoryculture.org/RSSModules/dtv/1.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Converseon Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.converseon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.converseon.com</link>
	<description>Join the conversation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:28:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Removes Organic Results in Local Tests by ukraine escort</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2010/08/13/google-removes-organic-results-in-local-tests/comment-page-2/#comment-3844</link>
		<dc:creator>ukraine escort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=545#comment-3844</guid>
		<description>Pleasant! Thanks a lot! It&#039;s my job to wished to generate inside my blog one thing for instance which. Am i allowed to participate of your respective submit so that you can this web site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pleasant! Thanks a lot! It&#8217;s my job to wished to generate inside my blog one thing for instance which. Am i allowed to participate of your respective submit so that you can this web site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A 2011 Retrospective and a Look Ahead to 2012 — the Year of &#8220;Social Rigor&#8221; by Paull Young</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2012/01/04/a-2011-retrospective-and-a-look-ahead-to-2012-%e2%80%94-the-year-of-social-rigor/comment-page-1/#comment-3840</link>
		<dc:creator>Paull Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=2672#comment-3840</guid>
		<description>What a year! Great to see the continued success of Converseon - a true leader in the social media space! Good luck on a huge 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a year! Great to see the continued success of Converseon &#8211; a true leader in the social media space! Good luck on a huge 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #DearSanta: We Want Apples in Our Stockings by Sullys</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2011/12/19/dearsanta-we-want-apples-in-our-stockings/comment-page-1/#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>Sullys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=2585#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>Dear Santa, I want Honda accord 1995 coupe.
And I`m Jewish so I hope it will work :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Santa, I want Honda accord 1995 coupe.<br />
And I`m Jewish so I hope it will work <img src='http://blog.converseon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple&#8217;s Social Media Policy is Just Fine by Sullys</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2011/12/06/apples-social-media-policy-is-just-fine/comment-page-1/#comment-3811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sullys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=2547#comment-3811</guid>
		<description>Les care about any of their policies, but south park sure had them in some recent episode regarding their policies, that was fun even they were totally pushing it too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Les care about any of their policies, but south park sure had them in some recent episode regarding their policies, that was fun even they were totally pushing it too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of Humans and Machines:  Human Coding vs. Human Analysis by pjuuqt</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2011/07/19/human-coding-vs-human-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-3810</link>
		<dc:creator>pjuuqt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=1913#comment-3810</guid>
		<description>CUwpPQ  &lt;a href=&quot;http://vdavlkokrbwu.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;vdavlkokrbwu&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CUwpPQ  <a href="http://vdavlkokrbwu.com/" rel="nofollow">vdavlkokrbwu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of Humans and Machines:  Human Coding vs. Human Analysis by Lesa</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2011/07/19/human-coding-vs-human-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=1913#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>I much prefer ifonramtvie articles like this to that high brow literature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I much prefer ifonramtvie articles like this to that high brow literature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Ways Brands Can Use Google+ Today by Sullys</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2011/10/28/how-brands-can-use-google-plus-today/comment-page-1/#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>Sullys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=2401#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>It has been discussed alot by how G+ helps with SEOing your website, and came to conclusion hat it may have SEO effects, but not by much, just like the decision to chose between &lt;b&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been discussed alot by how G+ helps with SEOing your website, and came to conclusion hat it may have SEO effects, but not by much, just like the decision to chose between <b> and <strong>.</strong></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Media Volumes Predict Winners of Video Music Awards and Emmys by Paul Wittenberg</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2011/10/20/social-media-volumes-predict-winners-of-video-music-awards-and-emmys/comment-page-1/#comment-3771</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wittenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=2212#comment-3771</guid>
		<description>10 out of 21 correct answers?  I&#039;m not sure that is considered a coin toss or a prediction.  I am sure that there were multiple nominees for each category, say 4.  So 21*4 would give you 84 possible winners.  Out of 84 possible answers, you got 10 of them right.  That is much better than a coin toss.  I think that a bit more analysis in your post would go further to proving the point you are trying to make.  Any chance of that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 out of 21 correct answers?  I&#8217;m not sure that is considered a coin toss or a prediction.  I am sure that there were multiple nominees for each category, say 4.  So 21*4 would give you 84 possible winners.  Out of 84 possible answers, you got 10 of them right.  That is much better than a coin toss.  I think that a bit more analysis in your post would go further to proving the point you are trying to make.  Any chance of that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Removes Organic Results in Local Tests by Ishan</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2010/08/13/google-removes-organic-results-in-local-tests/comment-page-2/#comment-3760</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=545#comment-3760</guid>
		<description>Well in the last 6 months google have made similar developments in other fields also and now with the release of google plus it is just a matter of time when Google will be adding social results in local searches. 
The problem with this approach is google is creating a bubble around us which might not contain the sufficient information.
I hope they know what they are doing as a bad step from a company as big as google can really be terrible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in the last 6 months google have made similar developments in other fields also and now with the release of google plus it is just a matter of time when Google will be adding social results in local searches.<br />
The problem with this approach is google is creating a bubble around us which might not contain the sufficient information.<br />
I hope they know what they are doing as a bad step from a company as big as google can really be terrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Search – No Longer What You Expect! by Steph</title>
		<link>http://blog.converseon.com/2011/08/23/google-search-%e2%80%93-no-longer-what-you-expect/comment-page-1/#comment-3754</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.converseon.com/?p=2073#comment-3754</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s decided that if you&#039;re likely to buy they will show you a store (overstock in this case) that may interest you. They do make sure that SITE has covered your search keywords but it no longer seems to matter if that PAGE has them. On the other hand if their data tells them you&#039;re not a buyer you will see informational sites. The results are not the same when logged in to Google.

I think your example Ted showcases the fact that Google is placing too much weight on transactional searches and is favoring brands or big online retailers more than ever.

The question is will smaller sites take the time to use the word couches and leather in a big enough % of their other articles to compete? Not likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s decided that if you&#8217;re likely to buy they will show you a store (overstock in this case) that may interest you. They do make sure that SITE has covered your search keywords but it no longer seems to matter if that PAGE has them. On the other hand if their data tells them you&#8217;re not a buyer you will see informational sites. The results are not the same when logged in to Google.</p>
<p>I think your example Ted showcases the fact that Google is placing too much weight on transactional searches and is favoring brands or big online retailers more than ever.</p>
<p>The question is will smaller sites take the time to use the word couches and leather in a big enough % of their other articles to compete? Not likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

